Archive

Archive for August, 2008

the word

August 29th, 2008 No comments

This blog's wordle

I came across a cute tool, Wordle, while reading this post on the Big Picture and decided to run wordle against my blog. The above picture is how wordle depicts this blog. Given my last post, it’s pretty funny that “data” wins by a landslide.

Wanting to always be a paragon of netiquette, I decided to also run it against the Big Picture. This yielded an interesting insight into that blog’s focus:
Big Picture Wordle

Update – I’ve fixed the link to wordle (.net not .com), thanks to Luca’s eagle-eyed editing.

Categories: dereferenced, technology

billions and billions

August 22nd, 2008 6 comments

billions and billions

While Carl Sagan’s famous formulation introduced a generation to the vastness of the cosmos, more recent history suggests that his memorable term might now be more aptly applied to financial extents: our deficits and debts, perhaps, to the economically or politically minded. But for those of us with the markets on our mind, the term has to evoke the enormity of the data we create and must manage every day. We’ve recently been working with the NYSE’s TAQ data in an effort to integrate it into StratBox‘s back-testing and optimization capabilities. And the enormity of the data is really just staggering.

Each day, the NYSE publishes all of the day’s quotes and trades as well as some reference data. Compressed, the data will just about fit onto a DVD. For one day. A DVD. Compressed. It’s really mind-boggling. A year of the stuff, uncompressed, will require over a petabyte of storage. Over 1,125,899,906,842,624 bytes. And that’s just the US Equities markets. You want options data, too? I hope your uncle is named EMC, because just managing the data is going to be a challenge

Read more…

notes from the underground

August 11th, 2008 No comments

notes from the underground... day 19

Categories: dereferenced

execution quality at the open & close

August 1st, 2008 8 comments

Execution Quality

I’ve been trading an increasing amount at the open and close of the equity markets using market-on-open (MOO) and market-on-close (MOC) order types and have found that the quality of executions varies enormously between the two types and have spent a bit of time analyzing the differences which I share below.

The quick scoop is that MOC orders almost invariably fill at the exchange’s published closing price, while MOOs vary very substantially from the published open price. Below I quantify my findings in a bit greater depth.

Read more…